Krishna R Acharya

Yeah exactly @theEdgeBreaker . > "so I'll look into another one to address." Didn't get you

I'm just wondering now, why we need zustand as simple as the question gets !

@theEdgeBreaker Sure, Just let us know the appraoch before implementing

@theEdgeBreaker Were you able to find some issue worth contributing?

Please add description, though the title explains the issue :)

Sure, but presently we already have decent folder architecture which has good seperation of concerns as below  How does project benefit by using the above SOA architecture, because we...

For now may be we can refactor the backend to use ts instead of js and leave the architecture for now as suggested in the title of the issue

@shmbajaj yeah sure. We'll do this, I am working on integration tests for backend, as soon as that is merged, lets do this

Please tell the approach and ETA @ppriyankuu

Sure please go ahead kindly follow PR guidelines