Joe Previte

Ah bummer! Okay well thank you for the quick update.

Hi @wolfy1339 - apologies, I don't really have the time these days to check. Here is where I was having issues: https://github.com/jsjoeio/github-email-extension/blob/master/src/content_script.ts#L110 Otherwise, feel to close

Do we copy the template, post as a comment and use it to keep track of our progress?

# [Clojure from the Ground Up](https://joeprevite.com/clojure-from-the-ground-up) View Progress - [x] Chapters 1-3 - Day 1 - [x] Chapters 4-6 - [x] Chapter 4 - Day 3 - [x] Chapter 5...

I came here to suggest the same thing. That would be huge!

Funny enough, my coworker @code-asher and I were just discussing this — specifically the `new URL(window.location);` example. We were wondering if the type definition for `new URL` should be modified...

> I think we should def look into this & see what are the benefits of compiling it to Wasm. Anything we learn from there will probably help us get...

Talking to @dwwoelfel and @sgrove about JS evaluation and they said they use [`quickjs-emscripten`](https://github.com/justjake/quickjs-emscripten). Reasons why they chose this: - There's *no* way for it to escape the sandbox -...

^I second this. We need this! I didn't manage to get anything beyond the really really basic test case but wanted to at least get the ball rolling 🤣

@Deep-Codes Hmm...I mean this folder is specifically for the runwasm website. the "with-nextjs" is a common pattern when you explaining how to use X with Y,Z tools. I don't think...