Jerold Haas
Jerold Haas
It's been a year since this has been opened. Is this feature still missing?
`Folding error: mode is not in 'folding-mode-marks-alist'` Is there another package that should be used instead to support folds in fsharp-mode?
I'm chainging the issue to something more generalized, as it appears that folding-mode might require polluting the file with comment-based symbols.
``` lisp (setq outline-regexp "\\( *module \\)\\|\\( *type \\)\\|\\( *let \\)") ``` Forgive my ignorance: where would this above line be used in, for example, a `.spacemacs` or `.emacs` config...
Considering spacemacs, I'd prefer it follow the evil binding for folds. Perhaps a dual binding can be done, for compatibility's sake?
I'm not clear on standards for evil bindings. - `z a` - toggle current fold - `z o` - open fold - `z c` - close fold - `z O`...
Lovely, thanks for the information, @nosami - that would imply that spacemacs already has its set of bindings for helm and the regular emacs commands for `outline-minor-mode`. So, then, all...
A relationship graph to illustrate the weighted relationships between packages would be a nice inclusion to this.
@Nathaire have you validated the end strategy as working as desired after training with this change? This is interesting to me, as well.
I did some (admittedly very brief) searching, but didn't come up with any results.