jchristgit

Hi @doublevcodes, are you still interested in working on this? If not I would put this up for grabs :slightly_smiling_face:

Hi @portasynthinca3! On master we removed GenStage in favour of `:pg`. In theory your usage of making a new consumer works with it, but in practice I think it's more...

> Does this belong in the main library? When I originally presented my PR in the unofficial Discord API server, people there suggested that I instead make it into a...

Hi everyone, is there a way to help out with getting this pull request merged?

Hi @wookie184. Did you find some time to look at the review comments, or is this up for grabs?

> I prefer getting the user to have python on ther PATH for the reasons I mention here https://github.com/python-discord/site/pull/773#discussion_r1160869869, so personally I'm quite happy with leaving the PR mostly as...

@BrandtHill There's a lot of voice-related warnings from Dialyzer here, where we are ignoring potential ok / error results. Do you think we should ignore the results as we do...

Thank you!

Ready for review.

With async I think we need to go the reverse route. The default needs to be `_async` and the sync functions then call that and await on the response.