Isaac Abraham
Isaac Abraham
Sure, I will have a look at doing this. In terms of design-time / special considerations - I have no clue; with the Azure Storage TP which takes dependencies, I...
@mauriciomagni I believe that the PK was already there. It's not about that - it's that it's trying to do some kind of optimistic concurrency check (at least I think...
If this is "core" behaviour of the Sql DA, I think this is more a feature add then - I would leave this is an option feature request as up-for-grabs...
We're seeing this exact issue currently
Perhaps consider DACPAC based deployment? This is pretty well supported in FAKE and works for both on-prem and Azure based deployments. Happy to help here.
@dsevastianov same here. We're hoping to have some time over the next weeks to contribute some stuff back into OSS projects, and this is one issue we could help with.
@dsevastianov I believe that's only valid if you use a config-based connection string. I'm using a literal connection string within a script, which requires a valid, already-opened SQL Connection. Ironically,...
I'm not sure if this is a bug or "by design" - with other parts of the TP, there was a decision made to have different behaviour in terms of...
@dmitry-a-morozov do you know if there was any progress on this - is this an F# blocker or something that can be done without a dependency on changes to F#...
Oh not critical. It was more that this was related to the discussion on Twitter regarding type providers the other day. Having said that this is IMHO a real value...