Aspen

That's a decent idea, just didn't want to break compat with 2.0 in this case. If @SaberUK is fine with losing that compat, then I'll definitely implement it, it'll be...

Hm, maybe having `requireaccount="no"` require the user to not be logged in, and leaving it blank or unset doesn't enforce any account requirement? It would break compat with older configs...

As suggested by @Robby- the current idea is `` for only match no account, allow any state, require account respectively. Unless anyone has any objections, I may go ahead and...

I think this now fits the currently agreed terminology from the discussion on IRC. @Robby- thoughts?

Anything holding this one up @SaberUK ? I've had a few people express interest in it for 3.0 (and a backport for 2.0 I'll do in contrib)

@SadieCat Any movement on this? it came up again, it's very useful for making it so SASL users can bypass dnsbl checks

I believe https://unicode.org/reports/tr36 and https://unicode.org/reports/tr39 lay out some basic recommendations for handling security considerations with unicode

This has been (at least somewhat) implemented in https://github.com/inspircd/inspircd-extras/blob/master/3.0/m_shed_users.cpp

@SaberUK ah, I just thought it was intended that they would be

I'm looking at writing a module that adds a custom message tag for the senders current rank in the channel, having a generic way to get the target of a...