Ingo Lütkebohle

Firstly, I support this feature request in general. > File systems and files very often do not exist on production controllers. I surmise that "configuration file" was short-hand for "configuration...

> I think this is decided by the sort of microprocessor you want to include in your target systems. From our side, for fairly classical mobile robotics use cases, we're...

Why do you think `rmw_time_t` is supposed to be a duration? Its uses of "uint64_t" seems to suggest it's a timestamp. That means it would be redundant with `rcutils_time_point_value_t`, though.

btw, I mentioned this @Karsten1987 a while ago: If you choose lttng as a tracer, instrumenting services or any other points you want to get data from would be trivial....

@clalancette I see that the action's PR is on a branch in this repo. Maybe more people can add commits that way? If yes, maybe we could re-target this to...

@clalancette I saw that it is easily possible to re-target the PR to a different branch. If you guys would be willing to give me access to the design repo,...

@gbiggs I think we got off a bit on the wrong foot here, most likely because you recall an earlier discussion on discourse whether rcl could be re-used or whether...

Update: I had some more text here earlier, but it's really besides the point. In the OFERA project, we're hedging our bets with regard to how much we can re-use,...

> Why don't you discuss the rmw (or rcl) plugging multiple middlewares? This would be an RCL topic in general, wouldn't it? In my experience, for MCUs, this is decided...

@clalancette What's your view on this? Can we merge? AFAICT, we resolved all major issues with this version of the document. We also had a SIG telco a while ago...