Harshil

> It would be great if someone could make another release from [a2205b3](https://github.com/timschneeb/RootlessJamesDSP/commit/a2205b373a874dad7ddbfa0f59eb3dfee3709d93). Those APK links all say expired. i'm too lazy to build it, but here's the build from...

> > Yeah I had the same issue. They actually fixed it in [a2205b3](https://github.com/timschneeb/RootlessJamesDSP/commit/a2205b373a874dad7ddbfa0f59eb3dfee3709d93) but they didn't make another release. You can grab the latest build from https://github.com/timschneeb/RootlessJamesDSP/actions/runs/8420122395 > >...

My use case is that I have 2 similar libraries in my [dependency-group], both take the exact same arguments via `config_settings` to the build backend, but I need to only...

I approve of this. I'm all for automation!

> @Bibo-Joshi hey there! Removed the Python

> Actually, there's some time out errors on some auto test runs, how do I solve those? don't worry about them, they're just flaky. However, `test-documentation-build` must pass too.

> question for my understanding: This is intended to make any tests noticed that should instead go to `WithRequest`? Yes, and also there are currently some tests in there which...

> What would you think of converting the wishlist in the comments into an issue and adressing them in multiple separate PR? that would give as the benefit of the...

created a new issue for the other points. I will have to rebase this branch and remove commits which are not relevant to the purpose of this PR

fair enough. Sorry I couldn't complete it over several months.