Zachary Hamm

Results 34 comments of Zachary Hamm

I'd actually love to have this implemented as well as it would be an immense help in tracking data throughout a test. [Cucumber allows attachments](https://github.com/cucumber/cucumber-js/blob/main/docs/support_files/attachments.md) of various file types to...

So I've determined that without capturing [ITestCaseAttemptData](https://github.com/cucumber/cucumber-js/blob/8f2ff573fba98af81d5c114b681b62b8aed12b1e/src/formatter/helpers/event_data_collector.ts#L5-L12) in Cucumber-JS, we don't have a formal way of exposing the attachments out to the hooks and such. It seems like relying on...

@christian-bromann, I've been looking through the code trying to understand how this message would be outputted, but I'm not too familiar with the underlying code. However, I've found some interesting...

I have some clarification here as I've been trying to find a good way to handle sending a scenario description to reporters. Looking at Cucumber's own documentation, a [Pickle does...

@christian-bromann, definitely. However, I believe it is a bug because WebDriverIO's [Testrunner Configuration](https://webdriver.io/docs/configurationfile) _does_ have an option for Cucumber profiles in both v6 and v7. ```js // If you are...

So @christian-bromann, ultimately, this property probably should be removed entirely unless we allow it only by command line. `profile` just allows us to merge additional options into the `cucumberOpts` that...

Yes, I have one here: https://github.com/hammzj/sauce-labs-report-portal-testing/releases/tag/report-portal-issue-1723 (Updated to use a tagged release) For our project, I was currently using this as the WebDriverIO service that allows logging to ReportPortal: https://github.com/BorisOsipov/wdio-reportportal-reporter...

Hello, just checking in -- were you able to recreate the issue with the example project I provided?

This is most likely related to my contribution https://github.com/webdriverio/webdriverio/pull/8432. I thought I had accounted for `--exclude` [here](https://github.com/webdriverio/webdriverio/pull/8432/files#diff-a6371afe18573d692a9a45868ec620cbcb7be1000b7f967217384f0fe356dc96R233-R244), but I suppose there are some discrepancies here. However, we should _not_ remove...

Ah, that's right. I didn't handle for `--exclude` within that change: https://github.com/webdriverio/webdriverio/pull/8432#issuecomment-1156425960