gramgrok

How about this: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x238866bcbf1abc18f4220a18c20586aa21226bdcd8c34397f6dba013a86749bf The investor contract at 0x55aa079e2fb0c8b68a0a08efbff3f1aa5472f1a2 (source code is provided) gets nothing on the next step, because of: 1) gas limit for "send" at SimplePonzi, 2) gas-consuming...

Then maybe this: https://rinkeby.etherscan.io/tx/0x5fa700b23a81ba8a21522f68e23244f71bdb42cdd28f32c680391f6d17264f4a This demo attack is performed on Rinkeby testnet with an exact copy of the SimplePonzi contract and with similar initial conditions (0.005 ETH and 0.007 ETH...

Wow! I was almost ready to start reading the opcodes of SimplePonzi to get a different perspective :relaxed: Let's reward the address of "successful attacker"... but not on Rinkeby :wink:...

Got the reward, twice the promised! Thanks again @k26dr and @chrisdannen !