Jakub Hampl

I think this technique is very common because the elm compiler already promises half of the optimisation: it removes the runtime overhead of the type wrapper, it just doesn't inline...

Perhaps just allow stuff in the project, but follow symlinks? This makes the most common case just work, and gives a reasonably straightforward workaround for the other cases: just symlink...

+1

Would it make sense to special case also `Math.log2` and `Math.log1p`?

But then again I myself can decide that the invariant shouldn't be there and release a patch version that breaks the invariant without any issues. Furthermore, the code that actually...

> Another situation of note that I just ran in to. > > ``` > permissions : SelectionSet (List GQL.Enum.Permission.Permission) GQL.Object.Person > ``` > > Ideally I would be able...

I can do the NRI one.

You might want to specify a bit the constraints. For example you could do mathematical operations in pure Elm, if you don't care that they will be horrifically inefficient. But...

Perhaps the question to ask is: how important is the fact of short-circuiting? I don't think in the context of Elm it makes much of a semantic difference; it has...

Just adding another use case where we ran into this. Our application at work is organised in two layers. There is the Base layer which provides a consistent design system...