Michael Gasch

Sorry if I'm misunderstanding, but what goes against using the official CE `proto` file? https://github.com/cloudevents/spec/blob/main/cloudevents/formats/cloudevents.proto Btw: related https://github.com/cloudevents/sdk-go/issues/744

QQ: What if `NewEvent()` would do a validation against a supported set of versions instead? This would require an API change though :/ In general I'd +1 on retrieving a...

Happy to work on a PR, though how do we make this protocol-independent? I.e. status codes only make sense for the HTTP `protocol` implementation. Alternatively, and this is what you...

So just to understand this: - The SPEC [defines](https://github.com/cloudevents/spec/blob/v1.0.1/json-format.md#4-json-batch-format) the format - The SDK currently does not support batching?

I think @csantanapr raises a good point: if we simply mimic `kubectl` behavior, there's probably not much gain for the end user. What is the UX we can provide on...

Sorry for my delayed response. As per the implementation KEP (https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/pull/1458/files), my understanding is that for this KEP K8s controller instrumentation is out of scope, BUT incoming requests (to API...

Yes, reference implementation for ideas (borrowed from #go) here: https://github.com/microscaling/microscaling

Yes, that was my workaround :) But pretty sure you're also not happy about this one :D

IMHO what could work is that `tparse` would ignore `"Action":"output"` when sending the buffer to `$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY`?

So `$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY` would be a magic file name then or is this already an env in Github CI which resolves to a particular file name? (haven't looked deeper into that...