Ralph Caraveo

So what modifications to the API are you proposing ultimately? Your usecase seems to be somewhat specific and maintaining backwards compatibility is important. Your analysis is detailed but it’s still...

Okay, I will look at adding these optimizations...in the meantime if you want to submit a PR to get this done faster that would be super helpful! Thanks!

@OLPMO - not yet it’s sitting in PR #63. Would you like to review the changes and let me know how it looks?

Actually, You are right about this: I'll take care of it. > On Apr 28, 2014, at 6:53 AM, bom_d_van [email protected] wrote: > > It's helpful if everyone using the...

I should have some time to look at it later today. Thanks for the interest! On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 11:47 AM Paul Lesiak ***@***.***> wrote: > I just...

@SignorMercurio - Hello, looks like this PR has merge conflicts after I merged a few PRs. Do you have any bandwidth to tackle them? I'm still swamped currently but will...

@SignorMercurio - hmm still seeing conflicts unfortunately. I am unable to merge.

First off Hello! 👋, Thanks for your interest and critique of this Go set based implementation. This implementation has actually gone through several iterations and refactors as I’m sure you...

I definitely support having some improved ergonomics like an `Append` api call. Maybe we can leave `Add` as is and go with this? Sounds like a plan.

So, I am going to lean towards not relying on the fuzz library because we’re dealing with types purely designed within the Go language. I would definitely be in support...