Daniel Schraik

I haven't gone in too much detail about the implementation of Rasters.jl, but I don't quite follow why there's an offset for `aggregate`. E.g., when aggregating a 100x100 raster (with...

Thanks! This should recreate the behaviour I'm seeing: ``` src = Raster(rand(100,100); dims=(X(0:99),Y(0:99))) #considering (0,0) as the corner dst = aggregate(sum, src, 10) #output extent is (5, 95) ```

Thanks for the clarification!