Daniel S. Katz

@editorialbot check references

@editorialbot generate pdf

Note: @askuric will be delayed in starting their review until 25 Sept.

@untzag and @askuric - Thanks for agreeing to review this submission. This is the review thread for the paper. All of our communications will happen here from now on. As...

👋 @Ajstros (Abraham Stroschein) - please work on the possibly missing DOI and incorrectly prefixed DOI that editorialbot suggests, but note that the missing one may be incorrect. Please feel...

👋 @untzag and @askuric - please go ahead and use the command `@editorialbot generate my checklist` to create your review checklist. @editorialbot commands need to be the first thing in...

@Ajstros - can you respond to the comments from @askuric above?

> Thanks @untzag, those lines have been fixed now. @untzag - can you now make further progress on your review? Or is anything blocking you?

@untzag - I'll just point out here that [JOSS's criterion on testing](https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html#tests) does not require automated testing, so while I think that using CI would be great, it shouldn't be...

This isn't just a problem for the reviewer, but it's a problem for meeting the `Community guidelines: Are there clear guidelines for third parties wishing to 1) Contribute to the...