Daniel S. Katz

Some editors use this step to check the pdf - the problem is if they are doing this, but the AEiC is proceeding to accept, because they don't know to...

> As far as I can tell, the only thing otherwise included in the accept stage is building the XML—is everyone actually going through that carefully? Because I am not......

> As far as I can tell, the only thing otherwise included in the accept stage is building the XML—is everyone actually going through that carefully? Because I am not......

No, AEiCs are not proceeding to accept without checks. Editors (not AEiCs) are using `@whedon accept` as a way to proof everything. This makes it unclear to AEiC what the...

It's hard for me to see that we could have a single answer to this that would be right for all projects/submissions, so I'm tempted to say that either model...

I think this might be complicated. Do we just want GitHub to list ORCIDs? Or to verify them? Or to be able to push to ORCID? Or do we (JOSS)...

Does one of the editors want to pursue the Clarivate Analytics / Web of Science path mentioned by @federeghe a couple of comments above?

> Normally, you don't want to have two different behaviors occurring from clicking on the navigation (one pulling you down to the anchor, the other sending you off to another...

I mostly like Lorena's suggestions, but they don't really solve the problem of it taking two clicks to get to author, reviewer, or editor guidelines - they would make the...

I think this is more or less done with the new web site. My only remaining suggestion is that "Docs" in the top header may not be the most description...