Chris

The enhancements to Rune were discussed with a group of CDM and TAWG Maintainers and consensus was reached on accepting the changes for use in the CDM.

Hey @minesh-s-patel , I can see you have approved this PR, do we need to merge or just close it? Thanks!

Hi @LionelSG-REGnosys These are auto generated dependency issues. I have discussed with REGnosys in the past but no real consensus was reached. It was more of an ad-hoc requirement i.e....

Discussed and agreed that we need to perform some analysis to determine which items can be pushed straight through, which need to be reviewed before acceptance, and which are not...

Hi @lolabeis > In that reading, the relationship should be the other way around, i.e `Party` extends `LegalEntity`. This makes sense to me, based upon the comments above and the...

From my perspective the proposed changes look fine, they enable a `LegalEntity` to be used instead of a `Party` for the `AssetLocation` we are proposing, and also allow a `LegalEntity`...

CRWG 18/03 Marc/Manuel confirmed will follow up with Leo

Looks good to me @gtarres As you say, let's not use `typeAlias` for now, but bear it in mind for a possible future enhancement.

@CDM-ReleaseManagement-AP - is this not a CRWG item as WorkflowStep pertains to all events, not just those for derivatives?

Hi @mgratacos, In securities lending we also perform an allocation when a trade is agreed ((and reallocations can be performed after the trade has been confirmed). This is where a...