Bryce McMath
Bryce McMath
> From my understanding, credentials issued with 0.4.2 should work, since at the moment we are not touching any tag in CredentialExchangeRecord during record migration I can confirm that revocation...
> could we also do this for credentials and proofs? @wadeking98 do you still want this? @genaris see any issue doing this?
>Do all of the forms still work as expected? Yes, tested each form after these updates
Hmm. I'm going directly from 0.4.2 to 0.5.3 I'll confer with @wadeking98 and make sure I'm not missing anything and then report back
@genaris @TimoGlastra any ideas? Any way we can help with this one?
I believe in this case (and in most of our ecosystem) it's all AnonCreds but with V1, so if you could try that combo hopefully you'll be able to repro....
For us to repro it, we basically install the last AFJ 0.4.2 version of Bifold or BC Wallet, get a credential from the showcase, and then upgrade to our latest...
@cvarjao been fixed in the contacts screen. Still occurs on CredentialDetails screen cause it's a more complicated fix
able to fix the `opposite operator` issue found by sonarcloud? The rest are mostly TODO warnings or not from your code, so not to worry about those, but I agree...
Looks good can we get it up to date with main?