Ava Hahn

> @avahahn The next step is for you to propose what we do about tagging. :) > > The original discussions were predicated on being able to generate releases without...

> There is certainly some amount of confusion around this... > > I see your _manually_ released unitctl and it has a tag of 999.1.2-thebeesknees > > I pulled your...

@thresheek Please correct me if I am wrong, but this is complete yes?

If you would like to avoid checking in the generated bindings you can always omit them and use [wasm-tools](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-tools) to adapt a generic wasm app into a proxy component! Here...

> Would showing the path (e.g /opt/unit/modules/python.unit.so) to the module be useful? I have wished for this information several times in fact! :) I think having this will better enable...

> Decide whether to add the compiling instructions here or keep them as a link to the repo My vote is to link to the repo for this. The instructions...

> Add the links to the binaries or remove the section I believe a good option here is to link to the github releases section in the Unit repo, as...

> > > Add the links to the binaries or remove the section > > > > > > I believe a good option here is to link to the...

> > I see that we have a global section for options. I am curious if there should perhaps be a section for options per subcommand? > > I also...

> This is not an urgent ask, so can definitely wait until unitctl :) @javorszky may I ask what exactly we are waiting for? Unitctl is present and functional. Most...