Anjan Nath

seems this is not a good return on investment, closing it, sorry about the noise! if users want to use topolvm they can manually enable/install it, we'll add a wiki...

maybe we need to also run `crc setup` in the job?

done in #4183

> > add a config option to enable users to choose if they want to use LVMS operator > > why a config option? initially, i thought of having a...

this is not needed anymore, installation of the operator is now handled in snc, by https://github.com/crc-org/snc/pull/877

supporting both makes it complicated for the user, and as using `topolvm` needs to alter the disk layout for creating a separate partition to be used, so it also changes...

> is there any use case where users would need to increase the root partition? (note: the image-registry is also using a pvc for storage so images pulled will be...

Should we instead document how the user can remove it by using the os provided tools (keychain in macos and credential manager on windows)? my concern is having both `pull-secret`...

looked at this a bit today, seems there's no way to find detailed processor capabilities like on linux. and the generic cpu info provided by `win32_processor` class doesn't provide correct...

> BTW. Is it possible to use a statically compiled solution? That way we don't have to care about LDFLAGS anymore. thinking I think it should be possible to have...