André

I understand. My standpoint remains: we are open for PRs. > > Am 09.01.2022 um 20:19 schrieb Bernhard Weller ***@***.***>: > >  > This is beyond my comfort zone...

Thank you! ☺️ I think it’s an interesting point. I don’t think we have enough resources at the moment. But I surely like the idea. So PRs are very welcome...

We could indeed add something like that. Not much effort. We would also need to add it to our DNS check. We could use something like dmarc-reports@MAILCOW_HOSTNAME. A MX record...

A DMARC parser will gain you security? There are a million services to parse them with nice reports etc. DMARC already is part of mailcow (Rspamd). I don’t understand how...

We already use DMARC, we just don't have an analyzer. This is not a core feature. It is a nice-to-have. Rspamd uses DMARC, it is not that we ignore it.

I like the idea. And I am sorry it was auto closed. But I personally have no time for this at the moment. :(

I have no idea how it could look like. Let me know if you guys have ideas.

I am too busy at the moment for this. @ntimo what's your opinion here?

Ok

I don’t really get it, I’m afraid, but it looks like a job for ~~Batman~~ [HX-Retarget and/or -Reswap](https://htmx.org/reference/#response_headers).