Anders Hammar
Anders Hammar
@deebloo No we're not. But we set up the webhhooks the same way and webhooks are called for changes to the target branch. It's just that we don't see that...
 Please note that we're using Bitbucket Post Webhook plugin, not native Bitbucket webhooks. So, to be clear, the use case I'm describing is something that should be handled already?...
Thanks for confirming. I tried to verify but for some reason I can't get the native webhook to work though, not sure why. We're currently not using native webhooks as...
No, haven't found a fix or workaround unfortunately. Still an issue for us.
As using http for maven repos was deemed a security issue (hence the changes in Maven) this should be changed. Changing from http to https is sufficient in the repository...
So, to clarify, the exact same source base sometimes produces a custom-war that, for example, includes git-client plugin v2.8.0 (as specified in the yml file) and sometimes v1.0.1 is included....
I'm trying to figure out how a enable FINE-level logging. Do I need to build a version of custom-war-packager with that hard-coded or is it configurable?
After some investigation I've found out that the prebuild war includes duplicated git-client.hpi and git.hpi files (two different version for each). DOn't know why, but that's what I see. I...
The culprit may be maven-hpi-plugin. I currently testing a newer version. I can reproduce by just building on the prebuild pom with "mvn clean package".
I'm getting the same behavior with v3.9 of maven-hpi-plugin. :-(