Anbu Sampath
Anbu Sampath
4.1 with Java 8.
> We intend to retain our JDK 17 build setup for the mainline, to be revisited when Loom goes out of preview (which would allow for compiling some explicit optional...
> ``` > > > > org.springframework.ai > spring-ai-bom > 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT > pom > import > > > > ``` you should continue to use above one.
> Should it turn into a compatible implementation over time`? Seems like Payara interested to make it - https://blog.payara.fish/hk2-the-hundred-kilobyte-kernel
> What do you think in relation to EJb deprecation/removal, RMI-IIOP deprecation/removal? Payara replaced remove ejb with http calls - https://blog.payara.fish/remote-ejb-via-http > What do you think in relation to EJb...
> Mine was intended to be an issue of reflection on the possible evolution/update on ejb component model. What do you think about it I would advise remove EJB as...
> We can improve the CDI functionality for the current Jakarta EE, and provide a migration chapter/section to move to CDI from EJB components in Jakarta EE tutorial. @hantsy Completely...
> I didn't actually replace remote EJB, just added an extra option. Sorry, My bad I used wrong word.
If Jakarta EE 11 is going to take another 15-18 months to get released. Java 21 makes more ideal choice for EE 11 baseline.