Andrew Guibert

I know I'm super late to this issue, but @hei1233212000 I believe the immediate issue you were facing was resolved a while back by PR #66. ---- Aside from the...

hi @garrettahines1, thanks for raising this issue along with testcases! Can you try @redmitry's suggestion of doing `final JsonValue arr = parser.getArray();` instead of `final JsonValue arr = parser.getValue();` in...

Fixed by #418

FYI I had to revert PR #418 from @Degubi because it was causing a TCK test to fail. We didn't notice it failed a TCK test originally because CI was...

hi @fhm84 thanks for raising this issue. When you say "preserve attribute order" I assume you mean preserving the order that fields/methods were defined in the source file? If that...

> Currently we use json files for configuring our system where sometimes the ordering of some properties matters. If property order matters, then perhaps your data model should reflect this?...

@mdzaebel @mkarg the doc you linked was for the old Java EE doc, the new JakartaEE doc does not show this serializer/deserializer example anymore: http://json-b.net/docs/user-guide.html#serializersdeserializers I just confirmed that the...

great news @Tomas-Kraus, looking forward to evaluating it. It is kind of hard to view what the proposed changes are because the PR https://github.com/Tomas-Kraus/yasson/pull/1/files includes many commits that we have...

thanks, now I can review the changes much more easily. I've added a comment on the PR on your personal repo, but I would suggest creating a "Draft PR" on...

If it improves performance and simplifies the codebase, I'm all for it. Main question will be backwards compatibility but I think we can rely on our unit tests and TCK...