Kai

@AaronLasseigne : Thanks, I'll continue leaning on the array workaround for my use case then. For implementation, I'd imagine it could reuse a lot of the validation code you already...

@cojack : that's fine, this change probably only impacts a small group of users, and doesn't actually "fix" anything, so it makes sense to put it on hold while other...

@MTschannett : The feature is ready, and there are no breaking changes. The code behaves the same as it did before, it just logs some additional information when it encounters...

Sounds good.

I too would greatly appreciate this getting merged