Tom Augspurger

If all the tests pass then that should be fine.

I meant the entire test suite, since other tests use it.

I think I'd prefer to target Dask 1.0 as a Dask lower bound for a little while. Happy to keep this open as a reminder when we do bump things...

Thanks @alimanfoo, I've applied your suggestions. @mrocklin do you have high-level thoughts on this? Does this feel like we're just documenting a workaround to a weakness of Dask that we...

Not at the moment. On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 2:00 PM Martin Durant wrote: > @TomAugspurger , did you have plans to > try to make the story here...

@mrocklin question on the HLG fusion: would you expect adding additional operations to the end of a task graph (e.g. `.store`) to potentially result in more fusion *earlier* on? My...

Thanks for the info Jim.

@jcrist one issue with this still, the code generated to connect the client is something like ``` from dask.distributed import Client client = Client("gateway://traefik-gcp-uscentral1b-prod-dask-gateway.prod:80/prod.bb16cdceacd541089ac9d7288d717595") client ``` but when auth is...

Merged them into a single "Working with text data" notebook that starts with different comparing different vectorizers (HashingVectorizer, CountVectorizer) and ends with the full pipeline.

No thoughts. Happy to hear what comes out of this. On Feb 23, 2022 at 7:39:31 AM, Jiaming Yuan ***@***.***> wrote: > Yes. > > — > Reply to this...