Shachar Zidon

I don't know how this was fixed, but in the latest release it all works great!

Added Hebrew #4183.

does this link work? https://linku.crowdin.com/

Hi, I'm running into this issue too right now. I'd be happy to attempt to add an implementation for tuples up to 676 items.

In my opinion, a library taking a position in cases like this usually makes it easier to solve problems and reduces fragmentation, so I'm all in favor of an official...

IMO that's a good thing, it encourages and makes it easier to do good error reporting, since you can access the span right then and there. Besides, it's opt-in only...

I really like this!

I think it's just a matter of changing around the type params to allow for it? ```rs fn nested_in, B: Parser

Updated, this seems to be related but I'm not sure how (maybe the same change needs to be made for `select` and `select_ref`?) ```rs let interpolation= expr .nested_in::(select_ref! { StringToken::Interpolation(inner)...

Can we discuss on Discord or something? I don't want to clog up the issue tracker with debugging.