Jose Carvajal

> This should already be covered: you can configure which namespace(s) the operator needs to watch so it should already be able to monitor custom resources in namespace(s) other than...

This failure is related to this change: https://github.com/resteasy/resteasy/pull/3034. Before these changes, the response was sanitized (see third parameter in line https://github.com/resteasy/resteasy/blob/61fa657f7612f2897cd10e0f761dfbbd514161ee/resteasy-client-api/src/main/java/org/jboss/resteasy/client/exception/ResteasyWebApplicationException.java#L25). After these changes, the response is simply propagated and...

In addition to the details of this issue, I've also found: 1. Looking deeper into the code, no `kind.yaml`, `kind.json` are expected to be created... I think the documentation is...

> @Sgitario: Thanks for your response. I forgot to add the exception that I get when I run the following command. This is what led me to believe (in addition...

This is related to this change: https://github.com/resteasy/resteasy/pull/3044. Basically, it will map all the unhandled exceptions to return 500 and collect all the inner exception messages. This test relies on the...

When enabling the logging for the DefaultExceptionMapper by adding this build step in ResteasyBuiltinsProcessor: ```java @BuildStep void logging(BuildProducer log) { // Increase log level for default exception mapper: https://github.com/resteasy/resteasy/pull/3044 log.produce(new...

> Maybe not ideal, but another option is to have Quarkus register it's own `ExceptionMapper`. As a test I just added this and it worked: > > ```java > @Provider...

To be precise, this happens to all unhandled exceptions. The previous behaviour was that all the unhandled exceptions were not mapped by Resteasy, so we could map it using our...

This handler was the logic that we were calling for unhandled exceptions: https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/blob/main/extensions/vertx-http/runtime/src/main/java/io/quarkus/vertx/http/runtime/QuarkusErrorHandler.java

> Were are we with this one? > > I personally think we should get it in My +100 to get it in.