Ryan Cavanaugh

Seems at least one person cares about it, which is good enough for me.

The circle of life :smile: 1. In the old implementation, but not in the spec 2. In the spec, but not in the new implementation 3. In the spec _and_...

I'd just like to raise this up again as it's been over a year and Babel still doesn't support it and TypeScript still doesn't support it, without major complaint as...

https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/pull/47994 was recently posted and looks pretty ready to merge IMO. There aren't any blockers from the TS side to supporting this syntax, it was just a matter of no...

@Huxpro the PR to support it on TS is ready to merge and I'm inclined to do so to match the spec and Babel unless you say otherwise. It's not...

I also find it personally distasteful, but just have no *technical* objections to it 😅

This is an issue on the TypeScript side - cross-project rename is a feature we're really hoping to get in for 3.0 (@andy-ms is working on it) but if we...

You don't need to target ES6 to use classes. TypeScript will convert `class YourComponent extends React.Component {` to the appropriate ES5 code that will work on an ES5 runtime with...

Including perfect reachability analysis in a definition of completeness is very questionable because it implies that any truly complete type system could be used to e.g. prove or disprove the...

We'll definitely need a way to repro this. Strange.