Claus Due

Has relation to discussion at https://forge.typo3.org/issues/78527, namely the presence of the `reverse` argument on `f:for` and the possibility that this will be deprecated.

There's a tiny difference between `f:or` and normal condition, in that `f:or` isn't a condition as such, but rather a "if this variable isn't set, use/do this instead". It's actually...

Now with 100% code coverage.

In case you didn't notice... this actually sneaks in neat ability: ```xml ``` Doesn't allow you to define the array inside the expression, only works on variables - but works.

Something to consider: should we allow left/right side to be `null` when the other is an array and the operator is `+`? In which case, we just return whichever side...

I hesitate to do this array union as a separate change exactly because it won't allow the array to be built directly in the expression. It's also not as easily...

Yes, I understood that, but I'd argue that this isn't a feature or a separate bugfix - it still falls into the category of this same error prevention (by guarding...

Hi @stephanschuler, Interesting use case (although it is kind of rare). The main problem I see is this: _when evaluating a node it is not known if the output is...

I do have some hints for improving your solution: * You could store the stream's handle in ViewHelperVariableContainer instead of creating it with a ViewHelper, this gives better separation of...

By the way, Fluid 3.0 will make it possible to create an even smoother integration of your use case. There are two important facts to know: * Fluid 3.0 discards...