Richard Brežák

```python if repo_name is not None: name = f"github:{repo_name}#checks.{name}" else: name = f"checks.{name}" ``` ah we're missing this bit of code, which was wrong anyway. I'll devise a fix

@Mic92 can we open issues for follow ups? Cause it is almost impossible to track with all the flake update PRs. They create way too much noise.

Oh yeah that is a horrible idea, I was thinkimg about caching the failures of toplevel derivations.

@Mic92 as far as I can tell, their failed build caching doesn't work across builds, https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/buildbot-nix/src/branch/main/buildbot_nix/__init__.py#L180 I don't see a persistent global failed build cache anywhere, so we cannot pull...

@puckipedia I must be missing something, because your code does trigger a scheduler per each derivation, as can be seen in the logs by the flood of `Scheduling` which are...

Ah okay, I can't please excuse my complete and utter blindness (turns out reading untyoed code is very hard, uhg I hate python with a passion), I got my arrays...

> And mind you, the "Scheduling" logic there is just replicating what the Buildbot `Trigger` class does. However, it does so entirely dynamically, rather than scheduling all builds at the...

Closed by #255

I don't think its currently possible to hide builds/builders as that's what showing up, not the build step as I initially thought. But for the future it would be nice...

Looks good to me too, @Mic92 do we merge?