Ana Hobden

I'd be open towards moving to `stable`, but don't consider it a huge priority as there is some fun stuff in `nightly` that we might be able to harness as...

@tschottdorf We do wait! [here](https://github.com/Hoverbear/raft/blob/9fc5f5db87263e26c7aa68d70b637042e59099bf/src/client.rs#L80-L83) you can see it waiting. Note the response from the server doesn't come until the entry is commited! [Here](https://github.com/Hoverbear/raft/blob/9fc5f5db87263e26c7aa68d70b637042e59099bf/src/consensus.rs#L485-L531) is where `proposal_request` is. [Here](https://github.com/Hoverbear/raft/blob/9fc5f5db87263e26c7aa68d70b637042e59099bf/src/consensus.rs#L502-L528) we...

These reconnection changes might be also useful for #77 (Membership changes). I might even be willing to argue that changing address/port demands a membership change.

@tschottdorf Hm, a good argument! :) Hadn't considered that.

> Are you already handling losing leadership during a proposal process (without reproposals, which seems to be the strategy right now, the pending command would have to be aborted in...

Absolutely! `basic_test` is bigger then it needs to be. Thanks for these suggestions!

Hi! Seems this is only on some databases? I notice on TiKV (https://github.com/pingcap/go-ycsb#tikv) we support multiple nodes.

@you06 OK! I think this would be very helpful!

@you06 Is there anything you could use help with in working on this feature?

@siddontang PTAL