Chadtech

Are any of these functions worth including in `List`? I've been maintaining `elm-community/list-extra` over the years, Ive gotten to see which `List.Extra` functions Elm people seem to like. Here are...

@Anton-4 Awesome!

Yeah. Sounds good.

For `enumerate`, lets not include that in `List.Extra` just because its simple. Thats my opinion at least. For `islice`, what does "islice" mean? And then, more importantly, what is it...

I guess we don't have any kind of `List` slicing function at all in the core list module or in `List.Extra`. There is a `slice` function in `Array`. Would an...

I think having a type with these very particular constructors adds a kind of complexity to the function that I think makes it harder to use in more general use...

I like `intersectBy`, but one problem I think with the name, is that it doesnt have anything to do with intersections any more. @witoldsz is right in pointing out that...

I am tempted to disagree with what you said about sets. I would think that one might want to preserve the order of a list, and get it's intersection with...

Right. I'm with ya. I still feel good about my proposal, if we just change the names (since they arent true intersections). How about `only` and `hasOnly`? So.. ```Elm only:...

**Parameter order** Okay I see what you both mean about the parameter order. Yeah, it should be flipped. **name** How about `filterMember`, in the singular? "Members" threw me for a...