Alan Rominger

What's the current status of this functionality? I see a PR was merged, but the documentation still states https://django-polymorphic.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/polymorphic.managers.html > Multi-table models are not supported. Experimenting on my own, it...

I want to press the question that @smcoll asked here, and express my own strong interest in getting this problem solved. > Can we lock down the requirements, such that...

> Allow the user to specify "before" and "after" steps that are prepended and appended to the instructions for the builder stage specifically. Point taken, but, I would put this...

With https://github.com/ansible/ansible-builder/pull/167, we allow customizing the build arg `PYTHON_BUILDER_IMAGE`. You can do this with `--build-arg` CLI or in the definition file. This is not yet released. We still have no...

I would like to address this generally. Not just for `--container-runtime`, but other options like `--output-filename` as well.

> I propose we move this logic to an external file I don't think that you're proposing that the default behavior will change. So some way or the other, we...

After looking over https://github.com/ansible/ansible-builder/issues/228 I'm majorly hesitating on this idea. We need a better handle on what categories of requirements are involved. If it basically comes down to test requirements,...

In cases we are relying on things like `python38-devel` https://github.com/ansible/awx-ee/blob/devel/_build/bindep_combined.txt#L10 We might leave those untouched, I'm not sure.

Could you link to a case of this? This shouldn't be too hard to implement but I want to know a little better what we're targeting.

This is still non-trivial, because `ansible-builder` is not installed in the EE itself. It's hard to figure out how one might do this without brittle volume mapping.