Alexander P. Cox

Yes, there are drawbacks. In the end, your approach gives you: ` instance_of cco:ActOfMotion cco:occurs_on instance_of cco:Day (and instance_of time:DateTimeDescription)` In other words, you've either lost or hidden almost all...

These terms already exist, but are currently in an extension ontology. They are being reviewed for promotion to the CCO.

If I recall correctly, there is an issue with xsd:date not being supported in OWL. This page supports this: (https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/XSD_Datatypes). This has been a minor annoyance to us for a...

Both terms already exist in an extension ontology (Agent History) as subclasses of 'Telecommunication Network Identifier', which is a DesignativeICE. They should be reviewed for promotion to the mid-level.

I'm not specifically opposed to changing to alphanumeric IRIs; however, I think that some of the arguments against continuing to use natural language IRIs are not as strong as they...

@BrianHaugh I address your latest comments in order below. Please see my March 1 comment above for more of my thoughts on this matter. 1. You claim that the semantics...

My initial thought is that it seems acceptable to say that a stasis has part a process that realizes some, e.g., function. But it is not OK to say that...

@eliasweatherfield Your elucidation is in line with how I have been using the 'Natural Process' versus 'Act' distinction. The idea is that a combustion process, for example, is a combustion...

@eliasweatherfield Yes, that is the idea.

Many of the terms (and more) discussed above are already in a domain ontology. Specifically 'Natural Satellite' and its parent class 'Astronomical Body'. This is an unfortunate case of terms...