0x7Fancy

Results 10 comments of 0x7Fancy
trafficstars

I'm stuck here too (this is so long time callback.XD based on the problems in my own scenario and reviewing #14, #28, and #36, I think that the current recursive...

going further, I found a way to mitigate; based on the above issues, we create simpler test cases, `test.json`: ``` { "": [["I ", "", "like C++\n"]], "": [["", ""],...

@h1994st if you think it's ok, I can send PR

emmmmm, wait a moment, this patch seems to still have problems, I will continue to follow up

@MegaManSec hi, I reproduced your original problem("causes a segfault from AFL (maybe only on startup)") I don’t know much about LL(*) grammar (antlr4). Based on my understanding of LL(1) grammar,...

sorry, the commit https://github.com/AFLplusplus/Grammar-Mutator/commit/6eae7d14f579b4d3d1196fc1a288c61044a1afe1, this is a wrong patch, '+' syntax will cause 'random_recursive_mutation' to be invalid, please roll back to https://github.com/AFLplusplus/Grammar-Mutator/commit/ff4e5a265daf5d88c4a636fb6a2c22b1d733db09; for antlr4, the '+' syntax uses breadth expansion,...

nope, the commit https://github.com/AFLplusplus/Grammar-Mutator/commit/ff4e5a265daf5d88c4a636fb6a2c22b1d733db09 is perfect, Grammar-Mutator will works fine. as users, what we need to do is to write the correct json syntax as correctly as possible (perhaps according...

yes, revert that PR. (or let me overwrite it later

I tried to solve the problem but I found that Grammar-Mutator has to rely on AST to work, if I add lexical rules, this is not transparent to Grammar-Mutator. In...