Fabien

> The re-use problems were mostly solved in OAS 3.1 / draft 2020-12 with `unevaluatedProperties`, and I really don't want to generate an endless stream of complaints about `additionalProperties` here...

> @Bellangelo if you want the schema to only consider object valid, then _somewhere_ there needs to be a `type: object`. Indeed, otherwise _3.141592653589793_ would be a valid `Pet`, which...

> The pip error is quite self explanatory: pip failed to install cryptography which is a transitive dependency of twine. The reason for that is that cryptography does not distribute...

> Hi @zx80! Thanks a lot for your contribution! > > I noticed that the following required information is missing or incomplete: issue reference > > Please update the PR...

As I do not understand how to please the CI bots, I submitted these two entries through the issue form instead, see #1832 et #1833.

@Relequestual: I closed this issue to use the form submission path instead. Should I reopen this one with keywords added to please de CI, or are the form submission sufficient...

> @zx80 Once the GH Issue is done and agreed, you should re-open the PR or create a new one, your choice. The form is just a proxy for creating...