Alexios Zavras (zvr)

A number of comments on various bullet points. I'll number them so that any replies can refer to an index ;-) 1. Hard disagree on using multiple language codes on...

1. If by _L1_ and _L2_ you refer to actual language codes, I'm fine with that. So, the series of tags in `support/3.0` will be `3.0.1`, `3.0.1-cn`, `3.0.1-ja`, `3.0.1-de` if...

In #1044 I add an almost empty file `docs/annexes/changes-from-previous-iso.md` to be filled in...

@kestewart @goneall @bact Any update on content for https://github.com/spdx/spdx-spec/blob/development/v3.0.1/submissions/ISO/annexes/changes-from-previous-iso.md ? ISO PDF has to be produced on Friday, AFAIK...

@stefan6419846 just to be clear, the latest (significant) changes to 3.0 happened last Saturday, and they will be reflected in the generated ontology next week.

I am sorry, but I do not understand. You are discussing adding a `hasImplementation` relationship, which will be the inverse of `hasSpecification` ? What is the gain of that? If...

There is no CONTAINED_BY RelationshipType in https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v3.0.1/model/Core/Vocabularies/RelationshipType/ only `contains`; perhaps you are referring to SPDXv2 ? The problem with introducing inverse relationship types (and the main reason why we don't...

Right, in HTML lists cannot be inside paragraphs. One may omit the end tag of a paragraph, but it is considered to be closing when a list-begin tag (`` or...

Sorry, but it's more complicated than that. Since it was decided that in SPDXv3 the data license need not be CC-1.0, it can be any license. Actually, it can be...

Thanks, @vmbrasseur . It's a missing ``just before https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/blob/3dd06eff6b8278bd3cb3ff2f0460e6099b5fb69c/src/GPL-3.0-or-later.xml#L525