Victor Shepelev

Hey, thanks, that all definitely sounds as a direction for further growing of the library. Currently, I want to just make sure it is stable (and use it in several...

I think let's leave it open :) I'm not a big fan of closing issues that should be done, even if this "done" is in far future. I'd rather have...

@ShamoX PRs are welcome :)

That's an interesting question, but probably outside of the scope of generic "value object" recommendations: that's something only domain might decide. In some domains, value objects should at least validate...

The only concern I have: this convention is a GitHub repo, which means it can (and probably will) change in future, and your translation will become stale. If you are...

I am not too sure it would be a good thing. Implementing class doing nothing except what described in the convention (e.g. construction, equality and so on) will demonstrate some...

Hey, unfortunately, Reality is a kind of weird state (huge refactoring/rewrite started, but then I don't have time to continue). Examples with "miracles" (in current README) work with prototype gem...

Currently, specs are not supposed to work at all. They are all related to the previous version (preserved for historical reasons as a https://github.com/molybdenum-99/reality/tree/old-prototype-branch) and was NOT updated during "search...

Thanks! I think, reality-based extension **can** be really cool, though I'm not sure which approach could be possibly used: 1. either complete port of Reality (and underlying libraries) to JavaScript...

I totally like the idea, but currently am not ready to do hosting/devops for this. Have no objections if somebody will :)