Zayd

Hi Abhishek! Yeah I agree with Karan, this is a really interesting ask. At it's essence, the addition to Guardrails would be beyond a validator as it exists. We would...

So pydantic has this https://docs.pydantic.dev/2.5/concepts/validators/#model-validators It looks like it would fix the problem, but I'm not sure that it works with the guardrails pydantic integration. The pydantic syntax is pretty...

outdated, we're now only supporting datatypes available in JsonSchema

+1

I pulled down the code, it looks like this will be resovled once a new version is created in pypi. Please create that version!!

Hi @aniruddha-adhikary trying to do this today as part of 0.4.4!

I assessed this, it looks like upgrading beyond 1.20.0 breaks our python 3.8 support. Figuring out if we should wait for 0.5.0 to declare guardrails on python 3.8 EOL

Interesting design! A few followups 1. Why implement this as a query engine instead of something else? 2. Guardrails already natively has support for input and output validation at the...

that's right! I'll incorporate before next version

Hi, that wasn't updated, tho it is prepped for 0.6.0 can we try something simple? I have like a weak hunch that an error msg might be getting swallowed somewhere,...