ZUO Zhihua

There is another way to support multiple precision: 1. Use `real` to define real number instead of `real(dp)`, and not explicitly define real number kind will make `fftpack` use the...

Thank you very much for your investigation @cval26 , I understand your content! Combining to create a unified `dct` and `idct` interface is a great decision. But I'm worried that...

Sorry, it was the PR merger that caused the closure of this issue, which has now been reopened.

Is there any progress?

I am happy that `fpm` supports native `flag` settings (see [my discourse help](https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/help-fallow-argument-mismatch-problem-of-basic-packages-fftpack5-1-quadpack-that-pre-support-fpm/1553)). I have just 2 months of ample time recently, and I am very happy to set up...

@henilp105 @awvwgk I noticed that the Chinese translation website "https://fpm.fortran-lang.org/cn/index.html" is not accessible, as well as "https://fpm.fortran-lang.org/zh_cn/index.html", check the source code: https://github.com/fortran-lang/fpm-docs/blob/a3409703d1b03b85b0abcedc1fe5872ca54b13e7/pages/_templates/sbt-sidebar-footer.html#L5-L10 I found that the use of `lang.lower()[-2:]` here...

> The select type logic is not really that much shorter than having several duplicated procedures for dealing with one-dimensional arrays. At the beginning, I tried to implement multiple procedures...

@awvwgk, @jvdp1, maybe the latest commit will make us more satisfied: 1. For a single array check, `select type` is still used, which is concise enough and introduces a small...

Thank you for review. This commit has added a **check on the size of the array**. Since my native language is not English, if there are some mistakes in the...

My main concern is that although the current solution caters to the coding paradigm of `test-dive`, **such a heavy API may be unsustainable in the future and destroy the simplicity...