Macros do not respect &trans
Currently, I cannot get a macro to respect &trans. The idea is that if a macro can leverage &trans, you could activate a key on a layer and follow it up with a different behavior (e.g. on key release). This could allow for accessing layers below the current layer, which can be followed up with a layer change, for instance.
same issue here. my use case is going to layer with several keys acting as arrow keys, and all the rest are mapped to &trans and go back to level 0. but both &trans &to 0 and &to 0 &trans dont work, and simple idea of disabling layer and pressing underlying keys has to be implemented like the workaround mentioned above
This is an architectural limitation, would likely be solved by #2848.