manager-ui
manager-ui copied to clipboard
Content: Multi Page Table View Title Bar is not responsive
Describe the bug Bluepixel has reported this extremely frustrating bug that is slowing down their daily workflows. Multi Page Table View Title Bar is not responsive which makes it difficult for their editor to quickly access the add item button in the top right corner.
https://www.loom.com/share/6abd6f52e5e140ef8836815c830de622?sid=4243a2f3-33d1-4be7-a44f-26cc25b5fc8d
Solution Please make the Multi Page Table View Title Bar responsive.
@zcolah As instructed our designs only officially support a minimum viewport of 1280px. What viewport are you suggesting should be supported?
When requesting something to be responsive we would also need more definition as to what needs to be done to achieve desired viewports. (What needs to wrap, what needs to shrink, what needs to disappear). In this case it seems like these decisions have already been previously defined but just for future requests
@zcolah when was this reported? A fix for this was merged 2 days ago. #2224
@agalin920 the table is actually wrapped with the draggable container component. Just isn't that obvious to be honest.
@theofficialnar Are you trying to say that since the sidebar is resizable this the user should resize it to fit the contents?
@agalin920 oh no, I meant the table is wrapped in a component that allows the user to drag it around to view the right-most end of the table so even if there's no scrollbar they should still be able to see the other right-most end of the table. It's just not that obvious that they can drag it around to view the end of the table since normally you'd expect a horiz scrollbar there, I mean at least for me, I only knew I could drag it around when I checked the code.
The fix I added was to make that table use 100% width instead of a set px width which inflates the whole page content's width.
@theofficialnar Gotcha yea the issue in the video is mostly regarding the action button not the table. Have you been able to reproduce because I have not been able to.
@agalin920 I was able to replicate it before #2224 was deployed
@zcolah Could you please describe reproduction steps
@zcolah should this be closed?