zertrin

> Doesn't this already exist as `--ignore-gooey` or am I misunderstanding the ask? [f42547f](https://github.com/chriskiehl/Gooey/commit/f42547fbe8439d9c4d6e812a183c4ef3baf6fc14) Not exactly. - First, the `--ignore-gooey` option is hardly discoverable and/or understandable by a casual user...

Actually, it seems that #203 was an almost spot-on attempt in that direction, but it did not get merged at the time.

Ahah! I didn't see this issue while responding to the other, but was thinking at exactly the same problem. So, yes that would be an interesting improvement of the script....

Hi, Thanks for opening this issue, this would be an interesting feature to have. It's probably possible to do it, however I am not sure how. I will probably not...

Thanks for this feature request, I'm not sure yet how easy it would be to implement (I am otherwise pretty busy IRL currently so I didn't have time to look...

You're right, this would be a very useful enhancement. Not sure I will be able to look into implementing it soon. Anyone feel free to propose a pull request before...

I fully agree. I'll look into this ~~soon~~ sometime since that's easier.

It doesn't happen to me since my backup doesn't last that long and I'm never rebooting around the time where my backup is running. Locking mechanisms are hard to get...

Some more info on this issue: the problem is basically that when using include/exclude-filelists with duplicity, there isn't yet an easy way to translate that into something that `du` can...

Thanks for your feedback. I have never used CentOS so I'm not sure what's happening here. The first thing to do would be identify **exactly which package** provides the `mailx`,...