ZeroTierOne Route settings fail

I'm using zerotier on 2 networks env. and i've set the route like this

now the problem is :

devices in pool A (192.168.0.0/23) cannot connect to pool B with ip: 192.168.10.xx, but is ok to connect via zerotier-ip(10.144.185.106)

devices in pool B connect to pool A is normal

Android phone connect with mobile network to both Pool A and Pool B is working fine

any setting gets wrong?

May 21 '25 06:05 EricNg8801

The hardcoded _p2p._udp.local service name is part of the libp2p specs^1.

Still, I agree that it is a realistic use-case that multiple protocols, or even multiple nodes in the same private network, need isolated mDNS discovery. The default should still be _p2p._udp.local, but we can make it part of the config that a user can overwrite.

CC @jxs wdyt?

Mar 26 '25 01:03 elenaf9

I would like to piggyback this issue with another question as well, is there a way for the user to add their custom TXT records? This would be reaaaallllly useful for my case, if possible 🙏🏻

Mar 28 '25 10:03 erhant

Hi, thanks for the ping @elenaf9, this has been discussed before on https://github.com/libp2p/rust-libp2p/issues/2898 and a spec issue was opened https://github.com/libp2p/specs/issues/620 I think this should be discussed at the spec level.

Mar 28 '25 12:03 jxs

@erhant would the proposal on https://github.com/libp2p/specs/issues/620#issuecomment-2883787541 help solve your use case? cc @elenaf9

May 15 '25 14:05 jxs