AtomicXXX type consideration

[anyoptional]

Currently, syncx package defines atomic types like following:

type AtomicBool uint32
type AtomicDuration int64
type AtomicFloat64 uint64

In this way, we cannot prohibit developers from using them as non-atomic types. Isn't it better to define it like this?

type AtomicBool struct {
    state uint32
}

[kevwan]

I think it's a good idea.

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 14 days since being marked as stale.