zepinglee
Hyphen not showing between page range, and words
The hyphen between page range is not showing after running lualatex. For example 123-125 is shown as 123125. Also hyphen is omitted in compound words e.g Black-Scholes is shown as BlackScholes in texstudio.
Additional information
- TeX distribution: MiKTEX
- Package
citation-style-languageversion: [e.g. v0.6.5 - LaTeX engine: [e.g.
pdflatex/xelatex/lualatex]
The hyphen between page range is not showing after running lualatex. For example 123-125 is shown as 123125.
Can your provide a small piece of LaTeX code to help me reproduce the bug?
Also hyphen is omitted in compound words e.g Black-Scholes is shown as BlackScholes in texstudio.
The correct delimiter in this case should be an en dash rather than a hyphen (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dash#Relationships_and_connections and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black%E2%80%93Scholes_model).
I realized that \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} is causing the omission of apostrophe and en dash in the bibliography. If I remove it, the citation-style-language package works normally but bold fonts are lost throughout the document. Can you suggest an alternative to T1 font for Lualatex that will retain bold fonts in the rest of the document? Thanks.
On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 10:39 AM Zeping Lee @.***> wrote:
The hyphen between page range is not showing after running lualatex. For example 123-125 is shown as 123125.
Can your provide a small piece of LaTeX code to help me reproduce the bug?
Also hyphen is omitted in compound words e.g Black-Scholes is shown as BlackScholes in texstudio.
The correct delimiter in this case should be an en dash rather than a hyphen (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dash#Relationships_and_connections and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black%E2%80%93Scholes_model).
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/zepinglee/citeproc-lua/issues/80#issuecomment-2408460140, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AK4NBY4BYHDHSCN7EHWHXCLZ3DN5NAVCNFSM6AAAAABPY66Q2KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDIMBYGQ3DAMJUGA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
I realized that \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} is causing the omission of apostrophe and en dash in the bibliography.
I can reproduce this problem with the following example.
\documentclass{article}
\begin{filecontents}[noheader, overwrite]{\jobname.json}
[
{
"id": "ITEM-1",
"type": "article-journal",
"author": [
{
"family": "Doe",
"given": "John"
}
],
"title": "Title",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2000
]
]
},
"container-title": "Journal title",
"volume": "1",
"issue": "2",
"page": "123-125"
}
]
\end{filecontents}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[style=apa]{citation-style-language}
\addbibresource{\jobname.json}
\begin{document}
123--125, 123–125\par
\textbf{123--125, 123–125}\par
\cite{ITEM-1}\par
\printbibliography
\end{document}
If I remove it, the citation-style-language package works normally but bold fonts are lost throughout the document.
I can't reproduce this after removing \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} in the above example. It's probably caused by other packages. Please provide an example to show it (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimal_reproducible_example).
Can you suggest an alternative to T1 font for Lualatex that will retain bold fonts in the rest of the document? Thanks.
I've found the following discussions but I've not fully understood the font encoding problem here. In general it's not recommend to use fontenc with luatex and fontspec can be used instead.
- https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/470976/are-there-cases-where-fontenc-luatex-or-xetex-cause-problems
- https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/468554/equivalent-of-fontenc-in-lualatex
- https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/412757/do-i-need-to-use-usepackaget1fontenc-if-i-use-lualatex