zenml
zenml copied to clipboard
Fix GCP step logging
Describe changes
The issue arises because GCS artifacts are immutable Stack Overflow thread. To fix the issue, I suggest a fix based on @strickvl 's idea mentioned below
Alex Strick van Linschoten's Idea
Consider using the logging.StreamHandler facility to temporarily write logs to the remote file (GCS, S3, etc.). Here's an example:
import logging
import fsspec
f = fsspec.open("gs://<<my_gcs_bucket>>/test_log.log", "w")
with f as of:
log_handler = logging.StreamHandler(of)
logger = logging.getLogger() # Root logger
logger.addHandler(log_handler)
for i in range(0, 5000):
logger.warning(f"I'm log line #{i}")
logger.removeHandler(log_handler)
This approach could fit nicely in the StepLogsStorageContext class.
My Solution
Set buffer size to sys.maxsize
and copy the existing contents of the log file to the buffer. This prevents the triggering of the part of code that appends buffer contents to log file once buffer is full and flushes buffer. (reference)
Code to test the change:
Please use GCS stack
import gcsfs
from zenml.client import Client
from zenml.logging.step_logging import StepLogsStorage, StepLogsStorageContext
client = Client()
_ = client.active_stack
TEST_FILE="gs://<<my_gcs_bucket>>/test.txt"
with StepLogsStorageContext(logs_uri=TEST_FILE) as log_storage:
for i in range(0,10):
print(f"I'm log line #{i}")
fs = gcsfs.GCSFileSystem()
with fs.open(TEST_FILE, 'r') as f:
all_of_it = f.read()
print('Final Contents:')
print(all_of_it)
Pre-requisites
Please ensure you have done the following:
- [x] I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md document.
- [ ] If my change requires a change to docs, I have updated the documentation accordingly.
- [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes.
- [x] I have based my new branch on
develop
and the open PR is targetingdevelop
. If your branch wasn't based on develop read Contribution guide on rebasing branch to develop. - [ ] If my changes require changes to the dashboard, these changes are communicated/requested.
Types of changes
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
- [ ] Other (add details above)
Summary by CodeRabbit
-
Refactor
- Enhanced the initialization process of
StepLogs
to support a maximum message limit and improved handling of log file reading errors.
- Enhanced the initialization process of
[!IMPORTANT]
Auto Review Skipped
Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the
.coderabbit.yaml
file in this repository.To trigger a single review, invoke the
@coderabbitai review
command.
Walkthrough
The update introduces an enhancement to the logging mechanism within the StepLogs
class by incorporating a max_messages
parameter for better log message management and adding functionality to recover logs from a specified URI, improving robustness and usability in diverse environments, including cloud storage solutions.
Changes
File Path | Change Summary |
---|---|
src/zenml/.../step_logging.py |
Added max_messages to StepLogsStorage initialization; implemented log recovery from logs_uri . |
Related issues
- zenml-io/zenml#2211: This PR could address the issue by improving log handling and ensuring completeness of logs in cloud storage scenarios, such as GCS.
πβ¨
In the realm of code, where logs do sprawl,
A rabbit hopped, aiming to enthrall.
With messages tamed, and errors so few,
Through cloud and through file, our insights grew.
ππ"Fear not," it whispered, "for I've found a way,
To keep our logs safe, come what may."
ππ
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
Tips
Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
- Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
-
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
-
Generate unit testing code for this file.
-
Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
-
- Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag
@coderabbitai
in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:-
@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
-
@coderabbitai modularize this function.
-
- PR comments: Tag
@coderabbitai
in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:-
@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
-
@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
-
@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
-
@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
-
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
-
@coderabbitai pause
to pause the reviews on a PR. -
@coderabbitai resume
to resume the paused reviews. -
@coderabbitai review
to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. -
@coderabbitai resolve
resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. -
@coderabbitai help
to get help.
Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore
anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml
)
- You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a
.coderabbit.yaml
file to the root of your repository. - Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
- If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation:
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json
Documentation and Community
- Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
- Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
- Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
@coderabbitai review
@adtygan there's a linting error that needs fixing
@strickvl , I ran the below commands before I made the PR
zenml integration install gcp
pip install click~=8.0.3
mypy --install-types
After that I ran
bash scripts/format.sh
bash scripts/run-ci-checks.sh >> .local/run-ci-checks.log
For format.sh
, I got the following output
For run-ci-checks.sh
, I got the following output in the terminal
I am attaching the log file for run-ci-checks.sh
. I see that the lint script ran without errors. I am not sure what I am doing wrong. Kindly request your assistance.
https://github.com/zenml-io/zenml/actions/runs/8307099335/job/22735937951?pr=2533#step:5:27 this is the specific thing you need to fix first of all.
In the commit I had made I do see the import at Line 25
SHA is: 34d179ca47be2927e1e0af77f5dd25d4971e186a
But after this, there was another commit made by you, and in this version I cannot see the import anymore
SHA is: 64a1e745e4b38efc5ff4ce9c6738e95199f4dd50
I am not sure why this is happening.
Check out this pull request onΒ
See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.
Powered by ReviewNB
It seems like maybe you're using an old version of the ruff
formatter @adtygan? Can you pip install "zenml[server,dev]"
again in your environment to make sure you're using the latest version, then rerun the script and push the changes? We def shouldn't be seeing changes to all these files in the PR.
I figured out that I was working on a fork of the repo so my develop
branch was out of date. I pulled the updates from upstream and then pushed my changes. Please review.
There are quite a few updated files in here that shouldn't need to be updated. Not sure what happened on your side or with the fork, but since the changes are small, it might be worth resetting this branch somehow so that only the changes you made are reflected in the changed files?
I only made a change to the logging/step_logging.py
file. But when I run the format.sh
script it modifies a lot of other files. Can I run the script on only the login file and push a commit? I think that should fix the issue.
You could try that, but the point is that the other previously-modified
files will still have been previously committed. have you made sure to
installed / upgraded the latest version of the dev tools? Probably if you
do pip install -U ruff
that would be enough, since that's the package
that's modifying / formatting files...
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 10:30, Aditya Ganesh Kumar @.***> wrote:
I only made a change to the logging/step_logging.py file. But when I run the format.sh script it modifies a lot of other files. Can I run the script on only the login file and push a commit? I think that should fix the issue.
β Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/zenml-io/zenml/pull/2533#issuecomment-2017569718, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAZRNJQYLQ2ZEIVVOF6DSWTYZ7VDFAVCNFSM6AAAAABEZCOQNWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAMJXGU3DSNZRHA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
I upgraded zenml
but not ruff
. I will do this also and then try once more like you mentioned.
Yeah the updates to the important formatting packages will only come when you update zenml[dev]
packages, not just core zenml @adtygan
I had already run pip install "zenml[server,dev]"
the last time. But this was using ruff 0.1.7
. I ran pip install -U ruff
after this like you suggested and it upgraded to version 0.3.4
. When I ran format.sh
now, it doesn't raise any errors. So I have now pushed my changes.
May I please know if there is any action required from my end to solve this issue?
@bcdurak is looking into it / at it
Thank you for your review @bcdurak . I agree with the points you have mentioned above. If I am allowed to propose a GCP specific solution, I have 2 approaches in mind.
- Patch the time limit as well so that my current solution can work.
- GCP, if I'm not wrong, allows some other way to create mutable files. But as far as I know, it won't be a GCS object. I will look into using these tools to solve the problem.
Which of the 2 routes do you suggest?
Thanks
linked to #2366 (closed in favor of this one)
Hey @adtygan,
I think the second approach would be better here if possible. The first one is still viable but I would only apply it if the active artifact store is a GCS artifact store.
As I mentioned before, logging has been an integral part of ZenML and we will be working on improving the user experience when it comes to handling these log messages. @safoinme is currently taking a look at our implementation. He can also share any insights and recommendations he comes across.
Thank you for your inputs @bcdurak . I will see how I can implement option 2. @safoinme could you please share your insights?
GCP issue shall be closed with https://github.com/zenml-io/zenml/pull/2755
Closed with https://github.com/zenml-io/zenml/pull/2755