Zeke Fast

I asked [question about idea to add implementation of `Extend` trait to `Option` type on iternals.rust-lang.org](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/implement-extend-trait-for-option/22442). Let's see where the discussion leads us!

@casey What do you think about having `required_version` attribute and implementation plan? I can prepare PR if it sounds as a useful feature to you and other maintainers

@laniakea64 Or nice! I haven't found that somehow! Though I search by `required` only.

I just thought and I thing we can do tow pass parsing, i.e. first pass normal parsing and second in case of errors tries to parse only settings (e.g. string...

Hey Aaron, I'd be glad to talk.

@AaronErhardt Thank you for the reply and guidance! I'll go through the issues and pull requests. But I also interested in things like is there something that you would like...

@AaronErhardt I fixed CI in #800 it would be good if somebody have a chance to review it. I propose merge #800 first and after that rebase #798 on `main`...

@chibli Could you please try out the change by [pointing to the Relm4 repository directly](https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/specifying-dependencies.html#choice-of-commit) (branch: `fix_810_-_reexport_relm_selection_ext_trait_publicly`, path: `relm4`)? Is it sufficient enough for your intention?

> Looks good. We could do a non-breaking release to incorporate this change. I think there was nothing breaking on the main branch AFAIK. That's sounds good. Once CI is...

So, CI fails because of this ```sh cargo clippy --examples --all-features -- --deny warnings error: use of deprecated associated function `relm4::gtk4::gdk4::Texture::for_pixbuf`: Since 4.20 --> relm4/examples/embedded_logo.rs:20:14 | 20 | Texture::for_pixbuf(&pixbuf) |...