nitter
nitter copied to clipboard
Search: is:poll
There's currently no way to filter for polls (of that I know of).
There is a way to filter polls but it would require more checkboxes which is counter productive to #217
Well the result would be to have twice the functionality in current space. With current 4 rows, it's possible to halve it and then add additional filters. End result being 75% the space with 130% the functionality
#217 is about 'this feature takes way more space than it needs for the same amount of functionality, let's make this more space efficient (and actually speedier to use)'
It could be possible using buttons with three states (neutral, filter, exclude) but I think that requires JavaScript.
I still can't see why you would need neutral (all neutrals could be done by (dis)select all. Could you provide a few examples?
e: you did, in #217
Neutral would be the same as not selected, but then you still need a way to represent the filter and exclude states.
but I think that requires JavaScript.
I don't think so, look at https://html.duckduckgo.com/html/?q=test; you can choose region and time without JavaScript, it will just send a new request, but that's exactly how filters works today.
For example we could have &nativeretweets=filter or just &nativeretweets=f in the url parameter.
I don't see how this is related to the issue, &f-nativeretweets=on is how it works today (=f/=e is not possible with checkboxes). The duckduckgo example is just a dropdown menu, not a custom checkbox with three states.
This can be done like so: card_name:poll2choice_text_only OR card_name:poll2choice_image OR card_name:poll2choice_video OR card_name:poll3choice_text_only OR card_name:poll3choice_image OR card_name:poll3choice_video OR card_name:poll4choice_text_only OR card_name:poll4choice_image OR card_name:poll4choice_video
I've also found a way to search for gifs, so I'll be replacing two of the current filters with that soon (probably "Pro videos" and "Safe").